Skip to main content
Utah · 2026

Best Financial Advisory Firms in Orem, Utah

11 registered firms in Orem. Rankings based on independent transparency scores from SEC Form ADV filings and FINRA data — no paid placements.

Financial Firms in Orem, Utah

Registered Firms33
Advisors125
Avg Advisor Experience12 yrs
Advisor Disclosure Rate13.6%-0.1% vs national

Orem, UT has 125 registered financial advisors across 33 firms. The average advisor has 12 years of experience. 13.6% have disclosure events on their record -- below the national average of 13.7%. The highest-scored firms are SANDLOT PRIVATE WEALTH LLC (TransparencyScore 91), PETERSON WEALTH ADVISORS, LLC (TransparencyScore 88), TIMPANOGOS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC. (TransparencyScore 88).

Showing top 11 of 11 firms in Orem

See all →
Sandlot Private Wealth LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser2 advisors
91.2
2
Strategia Investments, LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser1 advisors
90.9
3
Stream Financial Advice, LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser1 advisors
88.5
4
Peterson Wealth Advisors, LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser14 advisors
87.7
5
Timpanogos Financial Advisors, INC.
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser2 advisors
87.6
6
Exponent Wealth LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser8 advisors
87.0
7
Blue Barn Wealth
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser9 advisors
86.8
8
The Professional Financial COMPANY LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser4 advisors
86.5
9
Squire Wealth Advisors
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser13 advisors
86.1
10
Fortunate
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser1 advisors
81.2
11
Keeler Thomas Management LLC
Orem, UTIAInvestment Adviser5 advisors
77.5

Common Questions About Financial Firms in Orem

How many financial advisory firms are in Orem, Utah?
There are 33 registered financial advisory firms in Orem, Utah. Fidelon tracks all of them using public data from SEC Form ADV filings.
What does a Fidelon firm score measure?
Firm scores (0–100) measure eight factors: disclosure record (complaints, fines), Form ADV Part 1 filing quality, Form ADV Part 2 transparency, Form CRS quality, conflict disclosure, and for BD firms, regulatory standing and supervision quality. Higher scores mean more transparent, better-documented firms.
What's the difference between an RIA and a broker-dealer?
A registered investment advisor (RIA) is held to a fiduciary standard and must act in your best interest. A broker-dealer follows a suitability standard and can earn commissions. About 30% of firms are dual-registered, meaning they operate under both standards.
How do I read Form ADV?
Form ADV Part 1 discloses a firm's basic business structure. Part 2 (the "brochure") explains services, fees, conflicts of interest, and disciplinary history in plain language. Part 3 (Form CRS) is a two-page relationship summary required for retail investors. Fidelon scores all three sections.

How we rank firms

Fidelon ranks financial advisory firms using publicly available regulatory data from the SEC and FINRA — not paid placements, advertising, or referral fees. No advisor or firm can pay to influence their ranking.

Every firm's score is built from four areas: how clearly they disclose their services and fees, whether they have customer complaints or regulatory issues, how thoroughly they file required documents, and whether their business model creates conflicts with your interests.

Firms that earn commissions on product sales score lower on conflict of interest, because that pay structure can create a gap between what's good for them and what's good for you.

What we don't do

  • We don't accept payment from advisors or firms for better rankings
  • We don't sell leads or route your information to advisors
  • We don't rank by assets under management — managing more money doesn't mean better service

Data sources: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, IAPD. Scores are updated as new filings are processed.

How firm scores work

  • 0–100 score from public regulatory data
  • Form ADV analysis — filings, conflicts, fees
  • Disclosure history from FINRA and SEC records
  • No paid placements — fully independent rankings
Full methodology →