Croft & Bender is a dual-registered firm based in Atlanta, GA, that holds a 75.0/100 Fidelon TransparencyScore (th percentile), with 21 registered advisors. Score based on public SEC and FINRA filings.
Croft & Bender
Croft & Bender, LP · CRD #46680
A dual-registered firm offering both advisory and brokerage services with a clean record.
Fidelon Fact Sheet
CROFT & BENDER, LP used to be called CROFT & BENDER, LLC. The firm is an investment adviser in Atlanta, Georgia that is also a broker-dealer. It charges advisory fees. The firm has a clean record with zero disclosures, complaints, or fines on file.
How This Firm Works
Registration & Standard of Care
Dual-Registered — this firm operates as both an investment adviser (fiduciary) and a broker-dealer. Some services come with fiduciary protection, while brokerage services may involve commissions.
How This Firm Gets Paid
- Representatives can earn commissions on product sales
Key Findings
Strengths
- Registered as investment adviser with fiduciary obligation
- Clean regulatory record — no disclosures, arbitrations, or fines
Things You Should Know
- Also operates as a broker-dealer — may not always be required to put your interests first
- FINRA relationship summary provides less clarity about services and costs than higher-scoring peers
- FINRA filings don't clearly distinguish situations where the firm's interests may differ from yours
Conflict Audit
Multiple structural conflicts identified in regulatory filings. These are disclosed business arrangements — worth asking about, not disqualifying.
Source: Form ADV Part 1, Items 6-8; Part 2A, Items 10-14
Regulatory Track Record
0
Disclosures
Clean record — no disclosures found
$0
Total Fines
Clean record — no fines found
Regulatory Events
TransparencyScore Dimensions
Disclosure Record
Customer complaints, arbitrations, and fines. Frequency and recency matter.
92/100
Strong
Avg for dual-registered firms: 66.8 | Top 10%: 97.2
Filing Quality
How clearly the firm describes services, fees, and investment approach in regulatory filings.
70/100
Fair
Avg for dual-registered firms: 70.4 | Top 10%: 80.7
Conflict Disclosure
How openly the firm explains who pays it and what it's paid to sell. The conflict isn't the problem — hiding it is.
73/100
Fair
Avg for dual-registered firms: 62.2 | Top 10%: 79.3
Enforcement History
Past actions taken by the SEC, FINRA, or state regulators, and how well the firm supervised its people.
87/100
Strong
Avg for dual-registered firms: 59.6 | Top 10%: 86.5
Next Steps
Advisor Roster
21 advisors
| Advisor | CRD | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Bomar Tye | 2781172 | — | — |
| Ronald Bruce Goldman | 3061431 | — | — |
| Frank Hay Briggs III | 4124223 | — | — |
| Erik Matthew Zalenski | 4562881 | — | — |
| Robert Neale Fisher | 3092327 | — | — |
| Matthew Aaron Veal | 5505740 | — | — |
| Lee Odom Anderson | 6529253 | — | — |
| Connor Wansley Boston | 6501456 | — | — |
| Bradley Johnston Germany Jr. | 6815714 | — | — |
| Nicole Logan Montalbano | 6527066 | — | — |
Meeting Prep Kit for Croft & Bender
Walk into your next meeting fully prepared. We'll generate a meeting prep kit based on Croft & Bender's actual regulatory filings — not generic advice.
Get your free Firm Meeting Prep Report
A complete dossier on Croft & Bender — download instantly so you're the most prepared person in the room.
We never sell your information or share it with advisors unless you ask us to.
Monitor this firm
Get notified when something changes — new complaints, score movements, firm changes. Free.
Free: 1 advisor, monthly status report. Pro ($7/mo): up to 5, instant alerts, pending complaints.
Is this your profile?
Claim it to understand your TransparencyScore, unlock your level, and track changes over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the TransparencyScore measure?
The TransparencyScore measures how clearly and completely an advisor or firm discloses important information in their regulatory filings — things like fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary history, and business practices. A higher score means better disclosure quality, not better investment performance.
Where does this data come from?
All data comes from public regulatory filings: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, and 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, and the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database. These are official filings that firms and advisors are legally required to submit.
Does a low score mean they're a bad advisor?
Not necessarily. A low score means the firm's public filings are less transparent — they may use vague language about fees, skip details about conflicts, or have a more complex regulatory history. Some excellent advisors work at firms with poor disclosure practices. The score measures the filing, not the person.
What does dual registration mean for me?
It means your advisor can act as a fiduciary (putting your interests first) for some services and as a broker (suitability standard) for others. The key question to ask: 'For this specific recommendation, are you acting as my fiduciary?' Get the answer in writing.
How often is this data updated?
Fidelon refreshes data from SEC and FINRA sources on a regular schedule. Form ADV filings are updated annually by firms (with amendments throughout the year), and BrokerCheck data is updated as events are reported. Scores are recalculated after each data refresh.
Can an advisor or firm improve their score?
Yes. Scores are based on what's in public filings. A firm that rewrites its ADV brochure in clearer language, discloses conflicts more specifically, or resolves outstanding regulatory issues will see its score improve at the next refresh. The incentive structure is intentional.
Data Sources
Scores are generated using Fidelon's published scoring methodology and reflect the quality of public disclosures, not the quality of investment advice. A firm that improves its disclosures will see its score improve. Fidelon does not provide investment advice.
Verify on SEC IAPD · FINRA BrokerCheck
Last scored: · Score version: 3.8 · CRD #46680