Skip to main content

Dynamic is a investment adviser based in Phoenix, AZ, that holds a 73.8/100 Fidelon TransparencyScore (th percentile), with 77 registered advisors. Score based on public SEC and FINRA filings.

73.8Transparency Score
Bottom15%

Dynamic

A fee-only investment adviser with a clean regulatory record and fiduciary commitment.

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700, Phoenix, AZ, 85016
Investment AdviserFiduciary
Prep Kit

Fidelon Fact Sheet

DYNAMIC is an investment adviser in Phoenix, Arizona that has a clean regulatory record with zero disclosures or fines. It used to be called Williams & Novak Wealth Management, LLC. The firm manages investment portfolios and helps clients plan for retirement, estates, and taxes. It charges asset-based fees and fixed fees. It does not earn commissions.

73.8FairBottom 15% of scored firms
How they're paidNo advisory commissions. Other business lines not on file.
Asset-based · fixed fees
Duty to youLegally required to put your interests first.
Registered adviser · fiduciary
Assets under managementAcross 15,179 client accounts.
$5.6B
Firm size
77 advisors
Who holds your moneyThe firm reports it does not hold client funds.
No custody reported
Regulatory recordNo customer complaints, regulatory actions, or fines on file.
Clean — 0 disclosures
Based on live filings from SEC Form ADV and FINRA BrokerCheck. Scored using Fidelon's published methodology. Data as of Aug 2026

Key Findings

Strengths

  • Fee-only compensation — no commission income reported
  • Registered as investment adviser with fiduciary obligation
  • No broker-dealer registration — advisory services only
  • Clean regulatory record — no disclosures, arbitrations, or fines
  • Transparent fee structure — charges advisory fees, no commissions

Things You Should Know

  • Fee disclosure could be more detailed — while this firm charges fee-only (no commissions), its regulatory filings describe fee schedules and service terms less clearly than top-scoring peers
  • Fee disclosure could be more detailed — while this firm charges fee-only (no commissions), its regulatory filings describe fee schedules and service terms less clearly than top-scoring peers

Conflict Audit

Conflict AuditCaution

Our analysis identified 1 potential conflict of interest in regulatory filings.

Not registered as broker-dealer
No commission-based compensation
Receives compensation from sources other than client fees
No related-party custodian
No performance-based fees
No other business lines disclosed

Source: Form ADV Part 1, Items 6-8; Part 2A, Items 10-14

What this firm says about how it gets paid

Our asset-based fees increase as the value of your portfolios increases.

Source: the firm’s own Form CRS, filed 2024-03-05 — quoted directly

Regulatory Events

Advisor Roster

77 advisors

AdvisorScoreGrade
David Anthony Hughes
Jonas M Zamora
Ross Daniel Emmer
Mark Loal Anderson
Michelle Anne Kaufman Gulko
Konstantin Grigoryevich Etus
Steven Philip Kulesza
Derek Samuel Pantele
Matthew John Desmond
Melissa J Stewart

Meeting Prep Kit for Dynamic

Walk into your next meeting fully prepared. We'll generate a meeting prep kit based on Dynamic's actual regulatory filings — not generic advice.

Fee structure breakdown
Conflict of interest analysis
Regulatory track record
Fiduciary status check
Personalized questions to ask
How they compare locally

Get your free Firm Meeting Prep Report

A complete dossier on Dynamic — download instantly so you're the most prepared person in the room.

PDF reportInstant delivery100% free

We never sell your information or share it with advisors unless you ask us to.

Monitor this firm

Get notified when something changes — new complaints, score movements, firm changes. Free.

Free: 1 advisor, monthly status report. Pro ($7/mo): up to 5, instant alerts, pending complaints.

Is this your profile?

Claim it to understand your TransparencyScore, unlock your level, and track changes over time.

Claim Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the TransparencyScore measure?

The TransparencyScore measures how clearly and completely an advisor or firm discloses important information in their regulatory filings — things like fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary history, and business practices. A higher score means better disclosure quality, not better investment performance.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from public regulatory filings: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, and 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, and the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database. These are official filings that firms and advisors are legally required to submit.

Does a low score mean they're a bad advisor?

Not necessarily. A low score means the firm's public filings are less transparent — they may use vague language about fees, skip details about conflicts, or have a more complex regulatory history. Some excellent advisors work at firms with poor disclosure practices. The score measures the filing, not the person.

How often is this data updated?

Fidelon refreshes data from SEC and FINRA sources on a regular schedule. Form ADV filings are updated annually by firms (with amendments throughout the year), and BrokerCheck data is updated as events are reported. Scores are recalculated after each data refresh.

Can an advisor or firm improve their score?

Yes. Scores are based on what's in public filings. A firm that rewrites its ADV brochure in clearer language, discloses conflicts more specifically, or resolves outstanding regulatory issues will see its score improve at the next refresh. The incentive structure is intentional.

Data Sources

SEC Form ADV Part 1 — Filed Aug 2026SEC Form ADV Part 2ASEC IAPDFINRA BrokerCheck

Scores are generated using Fidelon's published scoring methodology and reflect the quality of public disclosures, not the quality of investment advice. A firm that improves its disclosures will see its score improve. Fidelon does not provide investment advice.

Verify on SEC IAPD

Last scored: · Score version: 3.8 · CRD #151367