Skip to main content

Forefront is a investment adviser based in Austin, TX, that holds a 84.7/100 Fidelon TransparencyScore (th percentile), with 29 registered advisors. Score based on public SEC and FINRA filings.

84.7Transparency Score
Top37%

Forefront

A registered investment adviser held to a fiduciary standard.

7500 Rialto Blvd, Bldg 1, Suite 250, Austin, TX, 78735
Investment AdviserFiduciary
Prep Kit

Fidelon Fact Sheet

Forefront is an investment adviser that charges 1.75 percent of assets per year. It is based in Austin, Texas. The firm used to be called Leone and Company Wealth Management, Mountain High Wealth Management, and Four Leaf Financial Planning. It manages investment portfolios and helps with financial planning. The firm holds client money, which means it can access client funds. It has a clean record with no complaints or fines.

84.7StrongTop 37% of scored firms
How they're paidNo advisory commissions. Other business lines not on file.
Asset-based · fixed fees
Duty to youLegally required to put your interests first.
Registered adviser · fiduciary
Assets under managementAcross 1,382 client accounts.
$239.8M
Firm size
29 advisors
Who holds your moneyThe firm or a related party can hold or access client funds.
Custody disclosed
Regulatory recordFull record in Regulatory Track Record below.
1 disclosure · last action 2018
Based on live filings from SEC Form ADV and FINRA BrokerCheck. Scored using Fidelon's published methodology. Data as of May 2026

Key Findings

Strengths

  • Fee-only compensation — no commission income reported
  • Registered as investment adviser with fiduciary obligation
  • No broker-dealer registration — advisory services only
  • Transparent fee structure — charges advisory fees, no commissions
  • Above-average TransparencyScore — 84.7/100

Things You Should Know

  • 1 regulatory complaint in public regulatory filings

Conflict Audit

Conflict AuditCaution

Our analysis identified 1 potential conflict of interest in regulatory filings.

Not registered as broker-dealer
No commission-based compensation
Receives compensation from sources other than client fees
No related-party custodian
No performance-based fees
No other business lines disclosed

Source: Form ADV Part 1, Items 6-8; Part 2A, Items 10-14

What this firm says about how it gets paid

The amount of your account assets affects our advisory fee; the more assets you have in your account(s), the more you will pay us. This gives us an incentive to increase those assets to increase our fee.
FWP’s revenue is from the advisory fees we collect from our clients’ accounts each month.

Source: the firm’s own Form CRS, filed 2025-03-04 — quoted directly

Regulatory Events

Advisor Roster

29 advisors

AdvisorScoreGrade
Brent Andrew Peddy
Aaron Oakley Best
Christopher Charles Marrone
Joseph Daniel Stabile
Aspen Lynn West
James Andrew Alders
Derek Houston St. Clair
Kevin M Churchill
Christopher Todd Owens
Abby Nicole Morton

Marketing Brands3 brands

Names advisors at this firm use when marketing to clients

Meeting Prep Kit for Forefront

Walk into your next meeting fully prepared. We'll generate a meeting prep kit based on Forefront's actual regulatory filings — not generic advice.

Fee structure breakdown
Conflict of interest analysis
Regulatory track record
Fiduciary status check
Personalized questions to ask
How they compare locally

Get your free Firm Meeting Prep Report

A complete dossier on Forefront — download instantly so you're the most prepared person in the room.

PDF reportInstant delivery100% free

We never sell your information or share it with advisors unless you ask us to.

Monitor this firm

Get notified when something changes — new complaints, score movements, firm changes. Free.

Free: 1 advisor, monthly status report. Pro ($7/mo): up to 5, instant alerts, pending complaints.

Is this your profile?

Claim it to understand your TransparencyScore, unlock your level, and track changes over time.

Claim Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the TransparencyScore measure?

The TransparencyScore measures how clearly and completely an advisor or firm discloses important information in their regulatory filings — things like fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary history, and business practices. A higher score means better disclosure quality, not better investment performance.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from public regulatory filings: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, and 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, and the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database. These are official filings that firms and advisors are legally required to submit.

Does a low score mean they're a bad advisor?

Not necessarily. A low score means the firm's public filings are less transparent — they may use vague language about fees, skip details about conflicts, or have a more complex regulatory history. Some excellent advisors work at firms with poor disclosure practices. The score measures the filing, not the person.

How often is this data updated?

Fidelon refreshes data from SEC and FINRA sources on a regular schedule. Form ADV filings are updated annually by firms (with amendments throughout the year), and BrokerCheck data is updated as events are reported. Scores are recalculated after each data refresh.

Can an advisor or firm improve their score?

Yes. Scores are based on what's in public filings. A firm that rewrites its ADV brochure in clearer language, discloses conflicts more specifically, or resolves outstanding regulatory issues will see its score improve at the next refresh. The incentive structure is intentional.

Data Sources

SEC Form ADV Part 1 — Filed May 2026SEC Form ADV Part 2ASEC IAPDFINRA BrokerCheck

Scores are generated using Fidelon's published scoring methodology and reflect the quality of public disclosures, not the quality of investment advice. A firm that improves its disclosures will see its score improve. Fidelon does not provide investment advice.

Verify on SEC IAPD

Last scored: · Score version: 3.8 · CRD #308521