Skip to main content

Klein Pavlis & Peasley Financial is a investment adviser based in Irvine, CA, that holds a 80.2/100 Fidelon TransparencyScore (23rd percentile among SEC-registered advisers), with 4 registered advisors. Score based on public SEC and FINRA filings.

80.2Transparency Score
Bottom23%
of SEC-registered advisers

Klein Pavlis & Peasley Financial

A registered investment adviser held to a fiduciary standard.

4 Park Plaza, Ste. 1010, Irvine, CA, 92614
Investment AdviserFiduciary
Prep Kit

Fidelon Fact Sheet

Klein Pavlis & Peasley Financial, INC. is an SEC-registered investment adviser in Irvine, CA. It used to be called Klein Pavlis Financial INC and Kpp Financial. Its 4 registered advisors typically serve high-net-worth individuals. It manages $232.7 million across 808 client accounts. It charges a yearly percentage of your account, and it does not report earning commissions. Its services include financial planning and securities ratings. It has regulatory actions and court cases on file, most recently in 2019.

80.2StrongBottom 23% of SEC-registered advisers
How they're paidNo advisory commissions. Other business lines not on file.
Asset-based · subscription fees
Duty to youLegally required to put your interests first.
Registered adviser · fiduciary
Assets under managementAcross 808 client accounts.
$232.7M
Firm size
4 advisors
Who holds your moneyThe firm reports it does not hold client funds.
No custody reported
Regulatory recordFull record in Regulatory Track Record below.
11 disclosures · last action 2019
Based on live filings from SEC Form ADV and FINRA BrokerCheck. Scored using Fidelon's published methodology. Data as of May 2026

Peer Context

National

8,337th of 10,815

SEC-registered advisers

Bottom 23%

State

1,030th of 1,277

SEC-registered advisers in CA

Bottom 19%

Local

26th of 37

SEC-registered advisers in Irvine, CA

Bottom 30%

Key Findings

Strengths

  • Fee-only compensation — no commission income reported
  • Registered as investment adviser with fiduciary obligation
  • No broker-dealer registration — advisory services only
  • Transparent fee structure — charges advisory fees, no commissions

Things You Should Know

  • 11 regulatory complaints in public regulatory filings
  • $202K in regulatory fines
  • Its brochure says it receives research or services from brokers, but it does not say those perks can shape which broker it picks for you, the firm benefits by not paying for those things, or whether every client benefits or only some. Ask how the firm chooses the broker for your trades and whether perks play any part.Item 12.A.1

Conflict Audit

Conflict AuditCaution

Our analysis identified 1 potential conflict of interest in regulatory filings.

✓
Not registered as broker-dealer
✓
No commission-based compensation
⚠
Receives compensation from sources other than client fees
✓
No related-party custodian
✓
No performance-based fees
✓
No other business lines disclosed

Source: Form ADV Part 1, Items 6-8; Part 2A, Items 10-14

What this firm says about how it gets paid

“the amount of assets in your account affects our advisory fee; the more assets you have in your advisory account, the more you will pay us and thus we have an incentive to increase those assets in order to increase our fee”

Source: the firm’s own Form CRS — quoted directly

Regulatory Events

Advisor Roster

4 advisors

AdvisorScoreGrade
Jason Robert Topor——
Justin Alan Klein——
Andrew Thomas Ryan——
Luke Gordon Guerrero——

Preparing for a meeting?

Pick an advisor at this firm to get a prep kit with their fees, conflicts, track record, and the questions worth asking.

Choose an advisor

Monitor this firm

Get notified when something changes — new complaints, score movements, firm changes. Free.

Free: 1 advisor, monthly status report. Pro ($7/mo): up to 5, instant alerts, pending complaints.

Is this your profile?

Claim it to understand your TransparencyScore, see your level, and track changes over time.

Claim Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the TransparencyScore measure?

The TransparencyScore measures how clearly and completely an advisor or firm discloses important information in their regulatory filings — things like fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary history, and business practices. A higher score means better disclosure quality, not better investment performance.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from public regulatory filings: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, and 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, and the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database. These are official filings that firms and advisors are legally required to submit.

Does a low score mean they're a bad advisor?

Not necessarily. A low score means the firm's public filings are less transparent — they may use vague language about fees, skip details about conflicts, or have a more complex regulatory history. Some excellent advisors work at firms with poor disclosure practices. The score measures the filing, not the person.

How often is this data updated?

Fidelon refreshes data from SEC and FINRA sources on a regular schedule. Form ADV filings are updated annually by firms (with amendments throughout the year), and BrokerCheck data is updated as events are reported. Scores are recalculated after each data refresh.

Can an advisor or firm improve their score?

Yes. Scores are based on what's in public filings. A firm that rewrites its ADV brochure in clearer language, discloses conflicts more specifically, or resolves outstanding regulatory issues will see its score improve at the next refresh. The incentive structure is intentional.

Data Sources

SEC Form ADV Part 1 — Filed May 2026SEC Form ADV Part 2ASEC IAPDFINRA BrokerCheck

Scores are generated using Fidelon's published scoring methodology and reflect the quality of public disclosures, not the quality of investment advice. A firm that improves its disclosures will see its score improve. Fidelon does not provide investment advice.

Verify on SEC IAPD

Last scored: · Score version: 3.15 · CRD #112414