Skip to main content

Oakwood Capital is a investment adviser based in St. Louis Park, MN, that holds a 83.6/100 Fidelon TransparencyScore (38th percentile among SEC-registered advisers), with 19 registered advisors. Score based on public SEC and FINRA filings.

83.6Transparency Score
Bottom38%
of SEC-registered advisers

Oakwood Capital

A registered investment adviser held to a fiduciary standard.

600 Highway 169 South, Suite 1410, St. Louis Park, MN, 55426
Investment AdviserFiduciary
Prep Kit

Fidelon Fact Sheet

Oakwood Capital, INC. is an SEC-registered investment adviser in St. Louis Park, MN. It used to be called L.O. Gardner INC. DBA Gardner Advisors and Gardner Advisors INC. It has 19 registered advisors. It manages $304.2 million across 1,051 client accounts. It charges a percentage of the money it manages for you, and it does not report earning commissions. Its services include financial planning, portfolio management, educational seminars and investment newsletters. Its filing reports disclosures.

83.6StrongBottom 38% of SEC-registered advisers
How they're paidNo advisory commissions. Other business lines not on file.
Asset-based · fixed fees
Duty to youLegally required to put your interests first.
Registered adviser · fiduciary
Assets under managementAcross 1,051 client accounts.
$304.2M
Firm size
19 advisors
Who holds your moneyThe firm reports it does not hold client funds.
No custody reported
Regulatory recordThe firm has disclosures on file. We don't have a count to show yet.
Disclosures on file
Based on live filings from SEC Form ADV and FINRA BrokerCheck. Scored using Fidelon's published methodology. Data as of May 2026

Peer Context

National

6,723rd of 10,815

SEC-registered advisers

Bottom 38%

State

137th of 222

SEC-registered advisers in MN

Bottom 38%

Local

2nd of 3

SEC-registered advisers in St. louis park, MN

Bottom 33%

Key Findings

Strengths

  • Fee-only compensation — no commission income reported
  • Registered as investment adviser with fiduciary obligation
  • No broker-dealer registration — advisory services only
  • Transparent fee structure — charges advisory fees, no commissions

Things You Should Know

  • Has regulatory disclosures on file — count not available yet
  • Its brochure says its people can earn commissions on securities, but it does not say you can buy the same products elsewhere, commissions can shape what they recommend, or whether commissions lower your advisory fee. Ask whether you could buy any recommended product through another broker or insurer.Item 5.E
  • Its brochure names an affiliated broker-dealer as a conflict, but it does not explain what this arrangement tempts the firm to do, say what the firm is paid for it, or say what it can cost you. Ask whether your trades or products go through a company the firm owns or is tied to, and what that costs.Items 10, 11, 12.B and 14

Conflict Audit

Conflict AuditCaution

Our analysis identified 1 potential conflict of interest in regulatory filings.

✓
Not registered as broker-dealer
✓
No commission-based compensation
⚠
Receives compensation from sources other than client fees
✓
No related-party custodian
✓
No performance-based fees
✓
No other business lines disclosed

Source: Form ADV Part 1, Items 6-8; Part 2A, Items 10-14

What this firm says about how it gets paid

“This presents a conflict of interest as we are financially incentivized to encourage you to place more assets in your advisory account as you will ultimately pay more in advisory fees.”
“Our firm, including affiliates, offers a cash sweep program as a core account sweep vehicle with our custodian, RBC. The sweep program generates financial benefits for us which creates a conflict of interest.”

Source: the firm’s own Form CRS — quoted directly

Regulatory Events

Advisor Roster

19 advisors

AdvisorScoreGrade
Corey David Pederson——
Jason William Roeske——
Jon Daniel Breimhorst——
Jonathan Drew London——
Jason Thomas King——
John F Devereaux——
Brian Scott Schaefer——
Douglas Stephan King——
Wendy Waalen——
Brandon Douglas King——

Preparing for a meeting?

Pick an advisor at this firm to get a prep kit with their fees, conflicts, track record, and the questions worth asking.

Choose an advisor

Monitor this firm

Get notified when something changes — new complaints, score movements, firm changes. Free.

Free: 1 advisor, monthly status report. Pro ($7/mo): up to 5, instant alerts, pending complaints.

Is this your profile?

Claim it to understand your TransparencyScore, see your level, and track changes over time.

Claim Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the TransparencyScore measure?

The TransparencyScore measures how clearly and completely an advisor or firm discloses important information in their regulatory filings — things like fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary history, and business practices. A higher score means better disclosure quality, not better investment performance.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from public regulatory filings: SEC Form ADV (Parts 1, 2, and 3), FINRA BrokerCheck, and the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database. These are official filings that firms and advisors are legally required to submit.

Does a low score mean they're a bad advisor?

Not necessarily. A low score means the firm's public filings are less transparent — they may use vague language about fees, skip details about conflicts, or have a more complex regulatory history. Some excellent advisors work at firms with poor disclosure practices. The score measures the filing, not the person.

How often is this data updated?

Fidelon refreshes data from SEC and FINRA sources on a regular schedule. Form ADV filings are updated annually by firms (with amendments throughout the year), and BrokerCheck data is updated as events are reported. Scores are recalculated after each data refresh.

Can an advisor or firm improve their score?

Yes. Scores are based on what's in public filings. A firm that rewrites its ADV brochure in clearer language, discloses conflicts more specifically, or resolves outstanding regulatory issues will see its score improve at the next refresh. The incentive structure is intentional.

Data Sources

SEC Form ADV Part 1 — Filed May 2026SEC Form ADV Part 2ASEC IAPDFINRA BrokerCheck

Scores are generated using Fidelon's published scoring methodology and reflect the quality of public disclosures, not the quality of investment advice. A firm that improves its disclosures will see its score improve. Fidelon does not provide investment advice.

Verify on SEC IAPD

Last scored: · Score version: 3.15 · CRD #112399